<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Not Much Has Changed&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bouncingthoughts.com/2008/03/not-much-has-changed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bouncingthoughts.com/2008/03/not-much-has-changed/</link>
	<description>News, Views &#38; Reviews on BPM, Performance Management &#38; IT industry trends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 11:16:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaisundar</title>
		<link>http://www.bouncingthoughts.com/2008/03/not-much-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaisundar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 20:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaisundar.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-158</guid>
		<description>@Om: In fact that is a very interesting thing you have pointed out - we have been in the business for over 20 years as an industry and we are more or less now veterans, what with Indians providing the Know-how to other up coming outsourcing destinations. The longer we remain at the same rung, the harder it will be to break perception that we can only do T&amp;M work and this is probably what you experienced in Germany!

The move up the value chain has always been expected to be gradual. I think a simple way to speeden that is to aim at a % of business that would come out of such business and keep that % growing - sounds too simplistic, but when our top companies start putting numbers, percentages and announcing those to the market, it will also be seen by investors as qualitative growth. And when investors demand that growth, then it would become a worthy drive. Whats more, a me-too effect may benefit the whole industry.

Someone has to take that hard call and gather the guts and will to pull it off and slap those numbers to hard targets!

But then, at the end of it all, as Meena says above, it&#039;s all a matter of supply and demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Om: In fact that is a very interesting thing you have pointed out &#8211; we have been in the business for over 20 years as an industry and we are more or less now veterans, what with Indians providing the Know-how to other up coming outsourcing destinations. The longer we remain at the same rung, the harder it will be to break perception that we can only do T&amp;M work and this is probably what you experienced in Germany!</p>
<p>The move up the value chain has always been expected to be gradual. I think a simple way to speeden that is to aim at a % of business that would come out of such business and keep that % growing &#8211; sounds too simplistic, but when our top companies start putting numbers, percentages and announcing those to the market, it will also be seen by investors as qualitative growth. And when investors demand that growth, then it would become a worthy drive. Whats more, a me-too effect may benefit the whole industry.</p>
<p>Someone has to take that hard call and gather the guts and will to pull it off and slap those numbers to hard targets!</p>
<p>But then, at the end of it all, as Meena says above, it&#8217;s all a matter of supply and demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Om</title>
		<link>http://www.bouncingthoughts.com/2008/03/not-much-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Om</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 13:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaisundar.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Its an &quot;unwinnable&quot; debate. What I have seen on the ground - Innovation and change in the way we service sounds good.

If you consider the cultural heap that we have transcend through to make us heard, its pretty unmanageable. You need to start somewhere and to start from the bottom is the easiest, risk free evolution. Obviously if the top stack is there for the taking take it.

I have seen opportunities having lost with a mindset of innovation and the way we provide solutions. I was recently in Germany for a big chemical comp, who were pretty nasty about their observation on Indian companies but had a corporate mandate to adopt offshoring. Considering the cultural blockade, had to adopt an evolutionary way of first partnering with them at some point and eventually scale up the value chain.

But for sure we are being heard even in closed cultural domain we are making inroads. I would look at the situation more optimistically and treat the resistance as manageable since its visible. The more noises you hear the more apparent is the way forward.

Easy money on the table, some one has to take it. If we dont some one will. Art of business ??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its an &#8220;unwinnable&#8221; debate. What I have seen on the ground &#8211; Innovation and change in the way we service sounds good.</p>
<p>If you consider the cultural heap that we have transcend through to make us heard, its pretty unmanageable. You need to start somewhere and to start from the bottom is the easiest, risk free evolution. Obviously if the top stack is there for the taking take it.</p>
<p>I have seen opportunities having lost with a mindset of innovation and the way we provide solutions. I was recently in Germany for a big chemical comp, who were pretty nasty about their observation on Indian companies but had a corporate mandate to adopt offshoring. Considering the cultural blockade, had to adopt an evolutionary way of first partnering with them at some point and eventually scale up the value chain.</p>
<p>But for sure we are being heard even in closed cultural domain we are making inroads. I would look at the situation more optimistically and treat the resistance as manageable since its visible. The more noises you hear the more apparent is the way forward.</p>
<p>Easy money on the table, some one has to take it. If we dont some one will. Art of business ??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meena</title>
		<link>http://www.bouncingthoughts.com/2008/03/not-much-has-changed/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>meena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 02:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaisundar.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-156</guid>
		<description>that may be true for some other countries too. Foreign software experts are attractive to U.S./uk-based companies, because they can be paid lower salaries. but then, as long as there is demand there will certainly be supply. so it is a cycle that is not likely to break easily</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that may be true for some other countries too. Foreign software experts are attractive to U.S./uk-based companies, because they can be paid lower salaries. but then, as long as there is demand there will certainly be supply. so it is a cycle that is not likely to break easily</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

